Stories about supernatural events appeared pretty regularly
in the London Times during 1855-1860.
Most likely they appeared so regularly because short articles on odd
occurrences are a good way to grab a readers attention and they certainly did a
good job of grabbing mine. As a newspaper that was mostly aimed at and written
by the educated middleclass, the articles reveal the middleclass’ views on
paranormal events. All of the authors approach the subject with skepticism and
the belief that only ignorant people actually believe that any magic could have
occurred. The London times seems to be
conflicted about what role religion and the paranormal has in everyone’s lives.
In general
The London Times’ believed that supernatural events were probably either
misunderstandings or a fabrication of someone involved. One of the first
articles I read was titled “A Scotch Ghost Story” published on January
27, 1858 and it told the story of a young woman named Mary W. who
befriended the servant of a house named Mrs. S. One day Mary came to Mrs. S.
sobbing about how her mother had just died and she needed to borrow a nice
black dress for the funeral. Mrs. S. obliged and lent Mary a dress that she
went to the funeral in. Later that day however Mary’s pale-faced mother turned
up at the house Mrs. S. worked. Eventually Mrs. S. found out that Mary had
simply lied about her mother’s death in order to get a nice dress to wear on a
date. Most of the ghost stories I read had similar logical explanations like
this one.
When
something appeared that could not be explained as a prank, science would be
looked to for an explanation. One case
like this is when an article called “A Shower of Herrings” was published on
July 28, 1857 about how a bunch of fresh herrings appeared in a garden in
Daliham about half a mile away from the shore. Since no one thought the
herrings could have been carried there by someone, the assumption was that the
herrings came from a waterspout. The article also mentions in a rather
condescending manner that some superstitious people were upset that people had
eaten the herrings.
There also,
of course, is the religious angle to supernatural events. I ran into an article
published on March 24, 1857 about the witch trial of a man named James
Tunnicliff. The author was indignant that a witch trial could be held at this
day and age even with all the improvements in technology and education. He
eventually used the story to argue that England needs to focus more on
education since there still seem to people out in the country who believe
ridiculous things.
Judging
solely by this article and the articles I mentioned prior, The London Time’s
readership seemed to purely be made up of people who based their view of the
world completely around science. In reality many of the readers were still
somewhat religious. The article about the witch trial actually sparked a
religious debate that went on in multiple letters to the editor during March
1857. The first letter questioned how
the author could suggest that we need to improve education if the bible said
that witches existed. A couple a days later a response was saying that the
previous writer had misinterpreted the bible passage on witches.
I like your article. It's really good. I think that what Mary did was wrong because she could ask Mrs.S to let her barrow the dress.
ReplyDeleteFrom the title, I was hooked! I think it's fascinating how the London Times always looked for a logical explanation for "supernatural" events. It really shows how advanced the community's belief in logic was.
ReplyDelete